Dear Sir,
I recently received my copy of "Preparing for Emergencies". The website
http://www.preparingforemergencies.co.uk/
recommends you dial 999, but I think it also sensible to insist on
being given a reference number if it is the police service you are
speaking to. This publication being the sequel to "Protect and Survive"
and it's counter "Protest and Survive" of 20 years ago preparing
for or avoiding war. Which was the sequel to the 4 minute warning of
the 60's and the TV documentary filmed in Tonbridge "The War Game".
In Tunbridge Wells a Library Foyer display was banded within a day or
two day of opening and Tunbridge Wells
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament collected
5,000 signatures in the following week to have it's display reinstated,
but instead a manager of the local library was sacked, and TW CND
marched through the town with a coffin representing the death of free
speech.
Civil defence planning, a course tutored by a retired police
man was run in Tunbridge Wells. Although emergency planning was said at
that
time to be intended for planning for any emergency, and knowing who had
a
tractor locally would be useful, the nuclear war and shooting the
looters after was the important lesson it turned out. Although it was
said
that they/we would deal with any emergency at that time, and not wait
until
after the
training was finished, but the lie became plain when we visited the
basement of Springfield
in Maidstone shortly after the very deep snow in North West Kent that
winter.
The
Civil defence old men had been playing boy scouts in their emergency
basement room - Playing Nuclear War emergency and shoot the looters
exercise whilst the snow accumulated outside too a record depth (1986?).
I don't think the retired policeman doing the training liked the part
of the training preparing for after a nuclear war exercise he was
supposed to teach us, and presented with one of the other exercises
instead or got distracted. One
of those distractions was by how, when he as a young
policeman with bicycle, he had had his helmet knocked off at pub
closing
time whilst on his own in a village. Though he was out
numbered an old lady came out of a house and told the drinkers to give
him his helmet back and go
home, which they did. I must say I have seen former infant school
dinner lady Val
Catt, and later to be Councillor, do the same sort of thing with
drinkers
brawling on Christmas eve in the town. Getting back to the civil
defence training - Eventually the trainer's senior came and sat in and
made sure the shooting the looters lecture
took place, not a very nice or practical lesson.
That was followed by the visit of police and emergency central control
in Maidstone where anything could be managed it seemed, followed by the
visit of Springfield I described above where we saw lots obsolete phone
equipment, and white boards with the same nasty lecture notes on it
from the after nuclear war exercise that they had been doing in the
past months.
Given that at the time US was planning a limited (tactical) Nuclear War
in Europe, I think in retrospect there was sense in government
ignoring the snow and preparing for the war, but it was nonsense, and I
am still doubtful about
calling
the
survivors looters and shooting them makes any sense either. So my
question is what are we being prepared for this time around?
Note for the letters editor - (not for publication)
Tunbridge Wells CND booked the Library foyer for a one month
display which came to the top of the waiting list two years later. Two
years latter happened to coincided with the governments civil defence
exercise
"Operation
Hard Rock" and CND's counter to it "Operation Hard Luck". The library
at about that time other displays had included Milk Marketing Board,
Battle of
Britten, English Apples, but probably one of the better presented was
the CND display which had been largely created by local artist Paula
Williams from Wadhurst. The month was cut
short after a day or two, but not really because it was tatty, but more
likely because Sir
Patrick Mayhew our then MP was civil defence minister, and would be
making a speech to Tory Conference at the time. A Library Foyer display
was inevitably going to coincide with something there was a lot of
pro/anti Nuclear War activity at the time.
The full civil defence guidance,
which was a reproduction of something from the 60's. Amongst the many
practical things were the plans for building a men's urinal. This
document was countered a Youth Tunbridge Wells CND publication.
Faithfully
Dear Sir,
I wish Alan Bullion or who ever is the Liberal Democrat
Prospective Parliamentary
Candidate for Tunbridge Wells luck. Peoples voting pattern reflects all
sorts of reasoning, next time people could try voting Labour for change
perhaps? Local Conservative
Parliamentary
Candidate's may as well be
the King of Siam (Thailand) and I am but one hair of his head, as far
as usual outcome is concerned, but things can change. In 1956 the
Labour Candidate Len Fagg got within 1,602
votes of winning, although the Labour vote dropped off from
1970
it has been steadily rise again since 1992. I recommend that you vote
for who I
really want,
whatever any
Left publication Alan might have read advises.
When voting for local council's though there are areas like
Southborough, where
if you want some scrutiny of local government, voting Labour is a good
idea. When Lib-Dems ran Tunbridge Wells Borough Council, they missed
some opportunities, like a environmental code of conduct for
local developers**. Even so the brief change of controlling party was
good and many good
things came out of the change. The audit report is another opportunity
for improvement of our week borough council. Next year there is a
chance that
at least one local Kent County Councillor be Labour. Needless to say
there is also a
place for local
press to scrutinise local government more than they do so now.
When the parliamentary election comes, despite the war, I do wish
for a Labour Government not just because Labour have
there act together more, but because Labour MPs have an excellent
record in
scrutinise there own government.
** Note not for publication
In 1996 High Weald Housing Association built 166 houses at Barnetts
Wood. Having done nothing for more than six months they made a
dreadful mistake resulted in the bulldozing of many nesting birds,
chicks and eggs. The fine for doing this could have been considerable,
but
unfortunately European directives were not applied in the UK although
they always were law. Although I was unable to persuade the developers
to defer building during the nesting season soon, or persuade the RSPB
prosecute, after the house were built HWHA offered to sponsor an
environmental code of conduct for
local developers. The condition was that voluntary code applied to all
local developers,
and TWBC would
need to pull it together and ensure that information on record from
organisations like Kent Trust for
Nature was passed on. Unfortunately Councillor David Mills was
unwilling to do that when he was the leader of the one time Lib-Dem
Borough Council.
Faithfully
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troops should assist in Asia KM Extra 21-01-05 with
photo of 11 year old Mya Howard holding a poster at the Rally in T/W on
18 December.
Dear Sir,
It is unfortunate that Government should have been dragged into a war
and occupation of Iraq. To there credit a large number of MP's voted
against that war unambiguously, and some troops refused to obey orders
to fight in an unlawful war. Troops should be sent to help, if needed
with the Asian disaster or brought home now.
There are various points of view on War and what we should do now. I
believe, that when military forces of occupation pull out the very long
process of healing of Iraq can start. The problem is that any form of
outside military force in Iraq is largely perceived (with good
reasons),
to be doing wrong however well intentioned. The outcome, I am sure will
include Iraqi oil being traded in US dollars, and will continue to be
painfully for the Iraqi's for many years whatever is done. I don't see
any reason to believe that the leaked UN report, prior to the war,
predicting that ultimately 1.26 million deaths due to war and disease
that follows is an underestimate.
If readers are interested Tunbridge Wells Peace Group
<action4peace@tun-wells.co.uk>
will be meeting next at the Toc-H hall
off the High Street, Tunbridge Wells on 7 and 21 January at 7.00pm.
Contact no. 07791 851 697.
Peacefully
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uniting the two parts
of St. Matts Schools, printed KMExtra 18-03-05,
Dear Sir,
Recently taxi operation have restarted between the two
parts of St. Matthews School, and that is subject of a planning
application. The school suffers from unauthorised parking on it's own
land and during the past decade has taken steps to minimise the effect.
Although no child has been seriously hurt so far, safety is a concern.
When a taxi firm operated between the two parts of the School, that
causes considerable annoyance to the school and neighbours. The
annoyance was greatly reduced following a change of use subsequently.
It is therefore concerning that an application to change back to taxi
firm
operation recently came about.
The transport depot business prior to 1991 operate very quietly, the
operator of that firm retired. Kent County Council nearly bought out
the
transport depot at that time, and the local press ran a story about
this
happening. The deal unfortunately fell through and Starline then bought
the site.
The proprietor of Starline, was helpful in dealing with problems that
arose a decade ago, but the problems were not resolved. The then clerk
to Southborough Town Council Graham Penticost was keen to help local
councillors resolve the problem. Meetings with KCC resulted at one
stage
with the proprietor of Starline finding an alternative site to relocate
to.
It would be handy if the two parts of the school were united.
Faithfully
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clarification of the
meaning of an advertisement, printed KMExtra 04-03-06
Copy to Marks & Spencer.
Dear Nigel,
Thank you for printing my letter in KM Extra 4 March copy below. Having
looked at the advert in wimpy again I see that the comparison is
between a Marks & Spencer's tuna sandwich, and a Wimpy Lean Berger.
I have also visited M&S on the 5 March and spoken to the food
manager Garry.
Sincerely
Published as a letter with
minor changes 04-03-06
To KM Extra News Paper, Advertising Agency, Wimpy
Dear Sir,
I have been wondering what the meaning of the
advertisement in the window of Wimpy in Tunbridge Wells (Junction of
Grosvenor and Upper Grosvenor). The poster advert shows a Wimpy Burger
with a number of grams of fat (oil) and a Tuna Sandwich with a higher
number grams of fat (oil). The poster suggests there is no choice, but
given that the poster does not mention the good Omega 3 oils in the
tuna fish, or whether the burger contains saturated fat, the advert
does not
say?
I would appreciate it if Wimpy would clarification the meaning of the
advertisement publicly. I am not a health professional, but I have
been advised by my doctor to watch the type of oils and fats I consume.
Sincerely
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air Quality on the A26, Sent to
the Courier 06-03-05 a much edited version was published 18-03-05
Dear Sir,
As readers will be aware the A26 Southborough to Tunbridge Wells has
been declared an Air Quality Management Area, and air quality is to be
monitored to EU/UK standards. The air quality is concerning and
as I
suffer from so called hay fever severally in the summer when near
vehicle fumes, I am keen for people and local authorities to get on and
do
something about it. The number of vehicle a day on the A26 through
Southborough is about 25,0000 a day and has been
the same for three decades, so presumably the problem has
existed for the same time. The air has been monitored for a decade, but
not to EU or WHO standard methods, so it can not be said that there has
been a problem previously, or whether vehicles have become more
polluting recently?
Part of the solution is to:-
* Create a pinch point north of Southborough (could be a traffic
light), to restrict traffic coming into Southborough
so that vehicles coming in wait until they can move through built up
areas freely. Cars entering Southborough having travel some distance
would produces more
NO2, the pollutant particularly problematic, and ozone, and that the
fewer vehicles taking shorter time to
complete their
journey the less vehicle fumes will be emitted.
* Encourage walking buses to school, and walking. This solution
would mitigate short vehicle journeys which produce high levels of
carcinogenic pollutants such as unburnt hydrocarbons.
* Make public transport (buses and trains) that run parallel between
Tonbridge to Tunbridge Wells cheaper, by subsidy, more frequent, and
reliable.
* Longer term; build a freight sidings at Good Station Road, and
Longfield Road to transfer local deliveries to road. The Shell heating
oil depot at North farm Road could start using there freight siding
again.
* Change the local plan to re-designate the industrial estate on the
High Brooms side of the rail line for residential use. Therefore reduce
the need for some heavy vehicle movements to occur through A26, and
High Brooms.
Traffic on the A26 is capacity limited, for each car
that
could be persuaded not to travel on that road another would replace it.
Therefore building roads won't solve any problems. Although most of the
traffic is coming into Tunbridge Wells not going through, the
restoration the
rail link T/W to Brighton would be helpful and would also provide an
alternative route to
London via Eridge.
The widening and
speeding up of traffic on the A21 at Castle Hill will
not help
as this route into Tunbridge Wells is congested. In
any
case it is selfish to attempt impose similar problems on Sherwood, High
Brooms,
and Pembury Road. In any case the section of A21 at
Castle Hill is noted in the Access to
Hastings multi-modal study for its low fatality rate, and safety on
that section of road is the
primary concern of the public. An
outer orbital motorway route
connecting the A21 to the A26 South of Tunbridge Wells is unlikely to
be built quickly or at all.
Many people are talk about building a bypass across Southborough Common
to Langton, this would spoil a lovely local amenity. Instead I would
like to see temporary fences and cattle grazing Southborough Common. I
acknowledge that the house building that would come with such a
scheme is needed.
Other measures widely discussed are to remove the traffic lights at Yew
Tree Road, but I think the lights are beneficial compared to the
problem that existed prior to there installation 25 years ago, even if
when switched off things seem better briefly. The pelican crossing
could be moved to in front of the Victoria Hall, and buttons for
pedestrians added to the traffic lights at Yew Tree, and Speldhurst
Road Junctions. Possibly loading lay-bys in front of the shops in the
same section might also help, but these measures will do nothing for
Southborough without a pinch point north of Southborough.
NOTE not for publication:- You may use this letter as First Person
article.
Faithfully
Reference: My Access to Hastings archive:
http://www.andrew.h.lohmann.btinternet.co.uk/home_a2h.htm/
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ahlohmann/A2H-FINAL-REPORT.pdf
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ahlohmann/A2H-APPENDICES.pdf